Feminists are always fighting for “equality.”
I put that in quotation marks, because the “equality” they want is never what one assumes the word means.
The “equality” they fight for instead involves picking and choosing.
Like enforcing women in all ranks of the military, while ignoring the selective services registration required of all men.
But I’m not an MRA: it’s foolish to be unaware of these inequalities, but it’s equally foolish to imagine men can succeed by playing the victim role as women have.
Instead I embrace the inequality just as I embrace my toxic masculinity.
“Equality” just proves inequality
The way feminists have pushed for (and succeeded in creating) women-only divisions, leagues, championships, and so on is cute as hell.
They knew they could never make society believe in equality by having women and men *gasp* actually compete against each other in sports.
So instead they made a bunch of kiddie leagues and divisions.
Nice job, girls.
Although it’s cute watching them try to copy men, it’s still sad watching all the fools who have bought into the lie.
The constant media celebration of women “champions” is a joke.
Take Tennis For Example
This heavily sponsored butch dyke is supposed to be a role model. Give me a break. If you haven’t heard this story then you’re in for a treat.
1998 Australian Open: the Williams sisters convince themselves that they can beat a man ranked … at least 200 (even they know they have no real competitive chance if the sport were desegregated).
They end up picking Karsten Braasch, who at the time was ranked 203.
He explains his warm up technique:
Preparation is crucial. Remember that a game like this is light-hearted – taking it too seriously would be a mistake. My training regime consisted of a leisurely round of golf in the morning followed by a couple of shandies. I turned up on court feeling suitably laid-back.
That’s right, he played an entire round of gold, and had a few drinks before the match.
He played only one round against each sister and ended up clobbering them: 6-1 & 6-2.
But don’t worry women continue to push for true “equality” in the sport:
In 2007, they ensured that all four of the tennis Grand Slams award equal prize money to women and men, because:
Winning a Grand Slam, whether you are a man or a woman, is work of equal value, an achievement mathematically and precisely identical across the gender line.
That’s a lot of big words to hide the lie that “equal value” and “mathematically and precisely identical” mean men beating men best of 5 somehow is the same as women (who can’t even compete against guys ranked 200) beating women best of three.
Fuck that, let’s have true equality: Desegregate the sport, and let’s see just how high these butches rank against men.
It’s not just physical
There is one example where desegregation already takes place. Well, almost.
Women have always been allowed to compete against men in chess in the same ranking system.
And yet, unsurprisingly, even in a competition that doesn’t take into account how big your biceps are, there has still never been a woman world champion.
Only a small number of woman have ever even broken the 500 ranking.
So, in the name of ‘equality’, woman still have their own segregated kiddie league where they can make-believe they’re champions too.
It’s a joke and makes another point for me, that the inequality of competition isn’t strictly based on our obvious physical differences.
Men are born to compete. It might have something to do with the fact we have 14-18 times the amount of testosterone in our body.
So if women want to keep their segregated leagues, let’s at least celebrate them, not for their masculinity, but for their femininity:
Tits or GTFO
That’s right, girls!
You can’t compete against guys, and we can’t take your special leagues seriously.
If you want to play sports, at least show off the assets you have.
Woman playing sports are already cute, they might as well be hot too.